Lit (or: to the scientist I am not speaking to any more) | Cristin O'Keefe Aptowicz
Don’t say you didn’t see this coming, Jason.
Don’t say you didn’t realize this would be my reaction
and that you never intended for me to get all worked up,
because if that were true, then you are dumber
than caLenny from Mice and Men, blinder than Oedipus
and Tierus put together andn feel less
than a Dalton Trumbo character.
You put the Dick in Dickens and the Boo in kowski
and are more Coward-ly then Noël.
But you don’t understand any of these references,
Do you, Jason? Because you ‘don’t read’.
You are a geology major and you once told me
That, ‘Scientists don’t read popular literature,
Cristin, we have more important things to do’.
Well, fuck you.
Be glad you don’t read, Jason,
because maybe you won’t understand this
as I scream it to you on your front lawn,
on Christmas Day, brandishing three hypodermic needles,
a ginsu knife and a letter of permission
from Bret Easton Ellis.
Jason, you are more absurd than Ionesco.
You are more abstract than Joyce,
more inconsistent than Agatha Christie
and more Satanic than Rushdie’s verses.
I can’t believe I used to want to Sappho you, Jason.
I used to want to Pablo Neruda you,
to Anais Nin And Henry Miller you. I used to want
to be O for you, to blow for you in ways
that even Odysseus’ sails couldn’t handle.
But self-imposed illiteracy isn’t a turn-on.
You used to make fun of me being a writer,
saying ‘Scientists cure diseases,
what do writers do?’
But of course, you wouldn’t understand, Jason.
I mean, have you ever gotten an inner thirsting
for Zora Neale Hurston?
Or heard angels herald for you
to read F Scott Fitzgerald?
Have you ever had a beat attack for Jack Kerouac?
The only Morrison you know is Jim, and you think
you’re the noble one?
Go Plath yourself.
Your heart is so dark, that even Joseph Conrad
couldn’t see it, and it is so buried under bullshit
that even Poe’s cops couldn’t hear it.
Your mind is as empty as the libraries in Fahrenheit 451.
Your mind is as empty as Silas Marner’s coffers.
Your mind is as empty as Huckleberry Finn’s wallet.
And some people might say that this poem
is just a pretentious exercise
in seeing how many literary references
I can come up with.
And some people might complain that this poem is,
at its core, shallow, expressing the same emotion again,
and again, and again. (I mean, there are only so many times
you can articulate your contempt for Jason,
before people get bored.)
But you know what, Jason? Those people would be wrong.
Because this is not the poem I am writing to express
my hatred for you.
This poem is the poem I am writing because we aren’t speaking,
and it is making my heart hurt so bad, it is all I
can do just to get up off the floor sometimes.
And this is the poem I am writing instead of writing
the ‘I miss having breakfast with you’ poem, instead of
writing the ‘Let’s walk dogs in our old schoolyard
again’ poem.
Instead of the ‘How are you doing?’ poem, the ‘I miss you’ poem,
the ‘I wish I was making fun of how much you like Garth
Brooks while sitting in front of your parents’ house
in your jeep’ poem, instead of the ‘Holidays are coming around
and you know what that means: SUICIDE!’ poem.
I am writing this so that I can stop wanting to write
the ‘I could fall in love with you again so quickly
if only you would say one more word to me’ poem.
But I am tired of loving you, Jason
cause you don’t love me right.
And if some pretentious-ass poem can stop me
From thinking about the way your laugh sounds,
about the way your skin feels in the rain,
about how I would rather be miserable with you,
then happy with anyone else in the world.
If some pretentious-ass poem can do all that?
Then I am gone with the wind, I am on the road,
I have flown over the fucking cuckoo’s nest,
I am gone, I am gone, I am gone.
I am.
Aptowicz’s writing is as humorous as it is depressing. The mood is at first angry, this anger translating to hilarity by the use of Aptowicz’s many allusions and repetition of her ex-lovers name, Jason. Her use of anaphora with the term “your mind is as empty as” is humorous and obviously gets her point across. The clever use of many different literary references and derogatory remarks against Jason are what keep the mood angry yet amusing. This changes, however, after Aptowicz’s states that this is “not the poem I am writing to express my hatred for you.” She goes on to state her underlying feelings about Jason, and how she is still in love with him. Her repetition of “I am gone” leading into the final “I am”, is her realization that she is nothing without Jason, and knows that no man will be able to fulfill what she felt with him. However, this last line can be interpreted very differently. It could be a defiant, and nearly sarcastic, last attempt at “getting over” Jason.
While analyzing the passage, interpret the last line. What do you believe it means?
A Haiku poem, originating from the Japanese culture, is written with 17 syllables, dividing into three lines of five syllables, seven syllables, and five syllables.
Slam Poetry is poetry meant to be read aloud. A movement extremely popular among young poets in the 1990's, it doesn't have many strict rules. These poems are usually performed at open mics, or poetry slams, where the limit to performance time is 3 minutes. Thus many slam poems are around 3 minutes in length. What makes a poem "slam" is the ability to entertain it's audience.
Slam Poetry is poetry meant to be read aloud. A movement extremely popular among young poets in the 1990's, it doesn't have many strict rules. These poems are usually performed at open mics, or poetry slams, where the limit to performance time is 3 minutes. Thus many slam poems are around 3 minutes in length. What makes a poem "slam" is the ability to entertain it's audience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
wow. that poem was... intense. I actually read the poem before I read the definition of slam poetry, and I actually didn't really pick up on the humor right away. I mean, it really just seemed depressing, especially when Aptowicz mentioned the "i miss having breakfast with you" poem (among others) opposed to the "...SUICIDE!" poem that she wrote instead. Its all so clever, the way she uses author's names as a play on words (Dickens) but also to represent a particular characteristic of Jason's: "you are more abstract than Joyce..." I supposed I didn't pick up on the humor because I didn't read the poem out loud, but now that I look over it, the whole concept of a rant on the failure of Jason's love is pretty amusing, in the way that Aptowicz writes it.
ReplyDeleteReading the poem, I couldn’t help but feel disappointed by the allusions I didn’t get and proud by knowing what Aptowictz was referring to. At least for me, I couldn’t help thinking these thoughts, so as to prove to myself that I am better then Jason, at least understanding some of the allusions, proving that literature is not completely dead to me. I did pick up on the humor the first time I read the poem, and did appreciate some of the references and analogies. I found the lines “you put the dick in Dickens” and “I used to want to be O for you, to blow for you in ways even Odysseus’s sails couldn’t handle” particularly amusing, as they relate to the contemporary audience. Despite all of these references and the derisive and scornful comments the speaker makes about Jason, she remarks how she is not writing the poem to win Jason back, although she kind of is. Aptowictz made reference to Toni Morrison and this poem reminded me of Beloved how “It was not a story to pass on” but in fact it was. While the speaker comments that this “pretentious-ass poem” is not one to win Jason back, she does want him back and if this does happen she will be happy. I think that in the last lines of the poem, the speaker remarks that she will not win Jason back by writing this poem, but if she does, “I am gone,” meaning that she will leave him if this poem brings him back to her. I think that in writing the poem, the speaker relieves her thoughts of Jason and she is writing more for her than for Jason. Good pick Chelsea. The style was interesting and one I was not familiar with.
ReplyDelete